home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
TIME: Almanac 1995
/
TIME Almanac 1995.iso
/
time
/
012990
/
0129008.000
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1994-03-25
|
3KB
|
78 lines
<text id=90TT0238>
<title>
Jan. 29, 1990: Busted By The Baby Boom
</title>
<history>
TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1990
Jan. 29, 1990 Who Is The NRA?
</history>
<article>
<source>Time Magazine</source>
<hdr>
WORLD, Page 36
RUMANIA
Busted by the Baby Boom
</hdr>
<body>
<p>By Landon Y. Jones Jr.
</p>
<p>[Landon Y. Jones Jr., managing editor of PEOPLE magazine, is
the author of Great Expectations: America and the Baby Boom
Generation.]
</p>
<p> The antiabortion measures imposed by Nicolae Ceausescu in
the mid-1960s are typically viewed as an example of his
repressive policies toward women. Yet the ironic fact is that
the abortion restrictions inadvertently--and literally--sowed the seeds that helped topple Ceausescu's regime 23 years
later.
</p>
<p> In 1966 Ceausescu surveyed his country's falling birthrate
with despair. The cause, he concluded, was a state decree in
1957 that legalized abortion and made it readily available for a
fee of less than $2. By 1965 abortion was the country's primary
method of birth control, with four abortions performed for every
child born.
</p>
<p> But in October 1966 State Decree No. 770 was issued, in
effect prohibiting abortion except under extraordinary
circumstances. At the same time, import of oral contraceptives
and IUDs was discontinued, and a package of other measures such
as birth premiums and reduced taxes for couples with children
was introduced. Rumania's mother heroines, as they have been
called, responded vigorously. In September 1967 births totaled
63,183, more than triple the number from the previous December.
The total number of births in 1967 was nearly twice that in
1966. Newspapers reported instances of three new mothers sharing
a single hospital bed.
</p>
<p> During the next few years, the birthrate gradually declined
as women rediscovered other means of birth control. But the
babies remained. From 1966 to 1976, Rumania produced nearly 40%
more babies than might otherwise have been expected.
</p>
<p> The result is a compressed baby boom--one that interrupts
charts of Rumania's age groups less like the metaphorical pig in
a python of the U.S. baby boom but rather more like a giraffe
in a python. In 1972 Rumania had twice as many children in
kindergarten as the year before. In 1989 twice as many
22-year-olds were flooding into the labor force. But Ceausescu
was unable to create jobs in the late 1980s as rapidly as
mothers created babies in the late 1960s. Revolutions are
carried on the backs of the young, and the sudden increase of
the always volatile 18-to-22-year-old age group destabilized
Rumania even more dramatically than a similar surge of baby
boomers disrupted American society in the late 1960s.
</p>
<p> Bucharest must still find a way to adjust to the social and
economic dislocations brought about by Ceausescu's baby boom.
Among the first will be an "echo boom" of children born in the
next few years to mothers who were born in the late 1960s. For
Rumanians, the aftershocks of State Decree No. 770 will be felt a
long time after 1966--or 1989.
</p>
</body>
</article>
</text>